Gregory Thompson, director of the productions this June, talks about his experience of working on the text for the first time and his realisation of the truly political nature of the play, saying that he recognised that this was as much a âparty political broadcastâ as an entertainment.
The challenges of the play, according to Gregory, are its historic distance from us as well as the changing nature of theatre over time â now we see plays almost entirely as entertainment. The other major difference is the playâs staging which is so remote from modern techniques. Moreover, the shadow of Shakespeare looms large over sixteenth-century theatre in general, so zoning in on the peculiarly Scottish, as well as the pre-Shakespearean character of this play, will present a challenge.
Gregory also discusses the Interlude of 1540 â its separateness and its connectedness to the Satire. Many of the entertaining digressions from the hard politics of the Satire are missing, giving the Interlude a sense of a being a âdramatized green paperâ. This could, of course, result from the fact that the only source we have for the Interlude, a letter from William Eure to Thomas Cromwell, necessarily emphasises the aspects of the drama that would have been interesting to the English Kingâs chief minister. Greg Walker has recently written about the differences between the two texts of the Satire and the Interlude and his paper will be uploaded to the website very soon.
